Hard to Believe: The Unreliabilty of Eyewitness Testimony
Public Deposited- Resource Type
- Creator
- Abstract
At the turn of the century, psychologists started to discover that eyewitness testimony was not as reliable as once thought. The findings have largely remained unincorporated into the legal process, resulting in miscarriages of justice. Drawing on the psychological research, and a reliabilist framework of doxastic justification, the author derives a sample set of epistemic norms to replace our unscientific colloquial norms; arguing that empirically backed norms, in addition to addressing legal injustices, would also go a long way towards addressing epistemic injustices.
- Subject
- Language
- Publisher
- Thesis Degree Level
- Thesis Degree Name
- Thesis Degree Discipline
- Identifier
- Rights Notes
Copyright © 2021 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner.
- Date Created
- 2021
Relations
- In Collection:
Items
Thumbnail | Title | Date Uploaded | Visibility | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|
cameron-hardtobelievetheunreliabiltyofeyewitnesstestimony.pdf | 2023-05-05 | Public | Download |