Cyclical fluctuation in response to cold pressor pain across the menstrual cycle
Public Deposited- Resource Type
- Creator
- Abstract
This study investigated possible cyclic fluctuations in pain sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Subjects were eighteen females with normal menstrual cycles, eight females who use oral contraceptives and eighteen males. As well, females who reported being dysmenorrheic were compared to female who experience little or no pain with menstruation. Female subjects were tested once at each phase of the menstrual cycle (menstrual, follicular, ovulatory and luteal) on the cold pressor task. Male subjects were tested at four correspondingly spaced time intervals. Magnitude estimation procedures, whereby the subject gives pain reports relative to an original standard of experienced pain, were used to monitor pain growth. Tolerance measures to the cold water were also recorded. Analyses revealed no fluctuations in pain sensitivity across the four phases of the menstrual cycle. Females who use oral contraceptives did not differ in their responses to the painful stimuli from females who do not use the pill. Whether female subjects scored as dysmenorrheic or nondysmenorrheic also did not influence responses. Male subjects on the other hand, had significantly higher tolerances than both female groups. As well, the numerical values male subjects attached to their pain reports were significantly lower than the ones given by female subjects. However, males did not experience pain growth at a significantly different rate than females. Results are discussed in terms of previous research, and social/psychological variables in the experience of pain.
- Subject
- Language
- Publisher
- Thesis Degree Level
- Thesis Degree Name
- Thesis Degree Discipline
- Identifier
- Access Rights
This work is available on request. You can request a copy at https://library.carleton.ca/forms/request-pdf-copy-thesis
- Rights Notes
Copyright © 1990 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner.
- Date Created
- 1990
Relations
- In Collection: