Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: The Case of Enbridge and the Northern Gateway Pipeline

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat or click here to download the PDF file.

Click here to download the PDF file.

Creator: 

Massie, Alicia

Date: 

2016

Abstract: 

This thesis is a qualitative critical discourse and multimodal analysis of Enbridge’s “Gateway Facts” website – an online discourse created to offer information regarding their Northern Gateway Pipeline project proposed in western Canada. A controversial project, Enbridge, like other oil corporations, has been forced to devote significant time and energy to justify and promote this pipeline. The website’s discursive strategies reveal four discursive themes used to legitimate the NGP: economic development, scientific and technical expertise, environmental stewardship, and industry leadership. This type of corporate legitimation may be a reflection of the broader ideology of late capitalism’s struggle to justify controversial practices at a time when environmental protection is a priority and public attitudes and understandings of corporate responsibility are shifting. This thesis underscores the importance of critical studies of corporate discourse, especially that offered online, as it has the potential to highlight the ideological underpinnings of corporations and their actions.

Subject: 

Linguistics
Mass Communications
Environmental Sciences

Language: 

English

Publisher: 

Carleton University

Thesis Degree Name: 

Master of Arts: 
M.A.

Thesis Degree Level: 

Master's

Thesis Degree Discipline: 

Applied Linguistics and Discourse Studies

Parent Collection: 

Theses and Dissertations

Items in CURVE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. They are made available with permission from the author(s).