The General Counsel, Gatekeeping, and the Investor Public: Uneasy Bedfellows?

Public Deposited
Resource Type
Creator
Abstract
  • This thesis examines the role of the general counsel across Canadian and American comparisons, specifically with reference to Enron, Livent, and Hollinger cases of fraud. General Counsel is in a unique position as both a business executive, and a law professional that can mediate their ethical obligations as a professional, as well as their fiduciary obligations as a corporate executive. Two models of responsibility will be examined: that of transaction engineer, and that of gatekeeper. Transaction engineer is primarily situated as a means of maximizing value for the corporation through the general counsel’s legal expertise, and this can include “loophole lawyering”. Counsel may be failing to provide adequate representation for corporate fiduciary responsibilities, as well as their ethical responsibility to not undermine the law in the pursuit of aggressive competitive advantage and short-term profit.

Subject
Language
Publisher
Thesis Degree Level
Thesis Degree Name
Thesis Degree Discipline
Identifier
Rights Notes
  • Copyright © 2013 the author(s). Theses may be used for non-commercial research, educational, or related academic purposes only. Such uses include personal study, research, scholarship, and teaching. Theses may only be shared by linking to Carleton University Institutional Repository and no part may be used without proper attribution to the author. No part may be used for commercial purposes directly or indirectly via a for-profit platform; no adaptation or derivative works are permitted without consent from the copyright owner.

Date Created
  • 2013

Relations

In Collection:

Items