Committing Sociology (of Law): The Autonomy of Law in Canada's 'War on Terror'

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat or click here to download the PDF file.

Click here to download the PDF file.

Creator: 

Silva, Derek

Date: 

2014

Abstract: 

Critical sociologists often argue that post-2001 counterterrorism policies, which depend on extraordinary powers and various executive provisions, are the ultimate example of sovereign power’s victory over the rule of law. Such opprobrium often ignores the empirical study of legal communications in lieu of policy documents and political discourses. As such, this thesis advocates for an analysis of legal communications in the context of Canada’s ‘war on terror’. The aim is to provide an alternative sociology of anti-terrorism law by engaging with a theoretical perspective often overlooked in
sociology: Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Through an analysis of Supreme Court of Canada decisions, this thesis examines the impact of anti-terror legislation on the autonomy of law. It is argued that while the system of law is always ‘endangered’ by threats from the outside, law’s creative maintenance of anti-terror legislation can be read as an example of the reinforcement of law’s autonomy.

Subject: 

Criminology and Penology
Law
Sociology - Theory and Methods

Language: 

English

Publisher: 

Carleton University

Thesis Degree Name: 

Master of Arts: 
M.A.

Thesis Degree Level: 

Master's

Thesis Degree Discipline: 

Sociology

Parent Collection: 

Theses and Dissertations

Items in CURVE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. They are made available with permission from the author(s).