The effects of crime type and evidence strength on jury verdicts and juror decision making


Dubreuil, Susan C. (Susan Catherine), 1963-




Carleton University undergraduate students role played mock jurors in a simulated sexual assault or robbery trial. Juries were randomly assigned to one of the cells of a 3 x 2 (3 levels of evidence x 2 types of crime) between groups design with the restriction of ten juries per condition. Juries were presented with an audio visual synopsis of the trial and then deliberated to a verdict of innocence or guilt.

In the strong evidence condition juries that tried the robbery case returned significantly more guilty verdicts than juries that tried the sexual assault case. More specifically, ninety percent of the juries that tried the strong robbery case returned guilty verdicts as opposed to fifty percent of the juries that tried the strong evidence sexual assault case. However, when the evidence was weak or moderate jury verdicts did not differ across crime type. When the evidence was moderately strong female jurors who tried the sexual assault case were significantly more likely to return guilty verdicts than female jurors who tried the robbery case. The implications of these findings are discussed.


Rape -- Psychological Aspects
Violence (Law) -- Psychological Aspects
Verdicts -- Psychological Aspects
Trials (Rape)




Carleton University

Thesis Degree Name: 

Master of Arts: 

Thesis Degree Level: 


Thesis Degree Discipline: 


Parent Collection: 

Theses and Dissertations

Items in CURVE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. They are made available with permission from the author(s).