What's Behind the Label? A Qualitative Study of Critical Thinking Exercises in Two Popular English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Textbooks

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat or click here to download the PDF file.

Click here to download the PDF file.

Creator: 

Sadat, Masih

Date: 

2018

Abstract: 

A review of the theoretical literature suggests three rival approaches to critical thinking: informal logic (e.g. D'Angelo, 1971; Ennis, 1987; Scriven, 1976), centred on generalizable cognitive abilities; epistemological (e.g. McPeck, 1981; Moon, 2008; Paul & Elder, 2016), centred on acquiring disciplinary knowledge and a relativist worldview; and critical pedagogy (e.g. Benesch, 2001; Canagarajah, 2005; Giroux, 1994), centred on neo-Marxist social transformation. This qualitative study employed deductive and inductive coding strategies (Pingel, 2010; Saldan͂a, 2016) to determine the extent to which these three critical thinking approaches were evidenced in exercises labelled as critical thinking in two popular English for Academic Purposes (EAP) textbooks. The textbook analysis revealed three major findings: the abilities targeted were frequently inconsistent with those abilities identified in the theoretical literature, the importance of subject-specific background knowledge was undermined, and there was a lack of concern for social transformation. The study concluded by offering several implications.

Subject: 

Linguistics
Education - Language and Literature
Philosophy

Language: 

English

Publisher: 

Carleton University

Thesis Degree Name: 

Master of Arts: 
M.A.

Thesis Degree Level: 

Master's

Thesis Degree Discipline: 

Applied Linguistics and Discourse Studies

Parent Collection: 

Theses and Dissertations

Items in CURVE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. They are made available with permission from the author(s).