Exploring the Relationship Between Scoring Accuracy and Predictive Validity in Risk Assessment Using the Service Planning Instrument (SPIn)

It appears your Web browser is not configured to display PDF files. Download adobe Acrobat or click here to download the PDF file.

Click here to download the PDF file.

Creator: 

Goodwin, Julie

Date: 

2022

Abstract: 

Accurate scoring is an essential component of a risk assessment's reliability, which in turn contributes to its predictive validity. This study tested a new method for evaluating the accuracy of completed risk assessments, described as intra-rater consistency. Pairs of cross-consistency items in the Service Planning Instrument were used to identify scoring errors. Participants were 31,460 adults (20.5% female; 20.7% Indigenous) on community supervision in Alberta. The overall base rate of error was low; Indigenous participants had higher rates of error than non-Indigenous participants. In the full sample assessments with errors had slightly higher predictive accuracy than assessments without errors (error AUC = .70, no error AUC = .68). Similar results were found among non-Indigenous sub-groups, however, there were no significant differences in predictive accuracy based on errors among Indigenous participants. Sex- and race-based differences in predictive accuracy were observed in assessments with errors, but not in assessments without errors.

Subject: 

Psychology - Psychometrics

Language: 

English

Publisher: 

Carleton University

Thesis Degree Name: 

Master of Arts: 
M.A.

Thesis Degree Level: 

Master's

Thesis Degree Discipline: 

Psychology

Parent Collection: 

Theses and Dissertations

Items in CURVE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. They are made available with permission from the author(s).